University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
True university students are now bringing a huge amount of attention to topics related to their own future career. Some critics argue, however, that universities can use some measures to get their students to study more important topics. In my opinion, I agree that learning more subjects makes students to some degree more knowledgeable, but I believe that just concentrating on their main subjects is valid for them.
Learning mastering more subjects, on the one hand, gives more knowledge to people and a well-rounded perspective on life. It is clear that many subjects are very important in practical terms in the tertiary curriculum. History, for example, teaches young generations how their ancestors fought against external intruders and made sacrifices to protect their motherland and their nations ‘ sovereignty. This subject thus fosters for the students a sense of patriotism. The intense syllabus of colleges, however, also causes students to feel overwhelmed by either a great deal of information to cram in.
On the other hand, people need to be skilled in the major that they choose to pursue in the digital era. It seems unarguable to divert students from their specialty by studying other subjects. In addition, people can easily mitigate their lack of knowledge after graduating from universities along with the information explosion. Information on the Internet is now widely available with high precision. In fact, encouraging students to concentrate on certain subjects will effectively build a strong workforce that is worthy of fostering a nation’s overall prosperity.
In summary, although some people argue that more subjects should be learned by students, I would support those who agree that excellence in one field of expertise is essential for tertiary students.